← Legal AI Policies /
AI Law Firm Toolkit

Texas law firms.
AI risk management.
Start today.

TRAIGA is current Texas law. Attorneys are paying $2,000–$15,000 in personal sanctions for AI errors. Two ready-to-deploy toolkits to help your firm build a documented, auditable AI governance framework — designed for Texas under TRAIGA, Ethics Opinion 705, and ABA Opinion 512. Attorney review required before adoption.

Texas Ethics Opinion 705 TRAIGA HB 149 ABA Opinion 512 TDRPC 1.01 • 1.05 • 3.03
Get Your Toolkit Order Now

No payment now  ·  Invoice by email

Understanding AI: What It Actually Does in Plain Language
Sample from Tier 1 Training Slides — Implementation Package
$2K–$15K
Sanctions already paid by Texas attorneys for AI citation errors in court
In Effect
TRAIGA is active Texas law since Jan 1, 2026 — compliance obligations apply to your firm now
1 Weekend
From zero to a compliant AI baseline — Starter Kit implementation timeline
17 Docs
Policy templates, training slides & implementation guides — ready to deploy
Current Law TRAIGA is not a future requirement. If your attorneys use AI tools in client matters, compliance obligations are active now. Documented governance is what distinguishes firms that exercised reasonable care from those that didn't — in bar proceedings, malpractice claims, and court sanctions.

The exposure is real.
The documentation is the defense.

AI governance isn't administrative overhead — it's the dated, signed record that shows your firm exercised reasonable care. Here's what that record protects against.

⚖️
01
Court sanctions are on the docket
Texas attorneys have already paid $2,000–$15,000 in personal sanctions for AI-generated citation errors submitted to courts. Judges are escalating enforcement and explicitly watching for AI-fabricated content.
TDRPC Rule 3.03 — Candor to Tribunals
🛡️
02
Malpractice coverage has conditions
A malpractice carrier denying a claim on "failure to take reasonable steps" is a real outcome for firms without documented AI governance. Carriers are beginning to evaluate whether firms have written policies when AI incidents are involved.
Documented governance supports a defensible position
🔒
03
Client confidentiality requires vendor vetting
TDRPC Rule 1.05 requires documented approval before client information enters any AI tool. Without a vendor vetting process, there is no way to demonstrate that obligation was met — regardless of what tool was used.
TDRPC Rule 1.05 — Confidentiality
📁
04
Bar complaints require records
A bar complaint investigation means responding in writing, producing records, and possibly appearing before a grievance committee. At a firm with documented AI governance, that investigation has a starting point. At a firm without it, the investigation becomes the investigation of you.
Dated, signed documents change the calculus
👤
05
Individual attorney liability doesn't transfer
Partners are responsible for staff AI use on their matters under TDRPC Rules 5.01 and 5.03. A firm-level policy documents the firm's standard of care — but doesn't eliminate each attorney's individual obligation under their own license.
TDRPC Rules 5.01 & 5.03 — Supervision
⚠️
06
Immigration & criminal defense: heightened risk
U.S.-based AI vendors are subject to the CLOUD Act. For immigration and criminal defense practices, data exposure can carry consequences beyond legal liability. Vendor vetting in these practices is not optional — and your clients may have the right to opt out entirely.
Specific guidance included in both packages

Clear. Practical. Ready to use.

Every document in the toolkit is built for real law firm workflows — not academic frameworks. Two samples from the Implementation Package are shown below.

Staff Training: What AI Actually Does in Plain Language
Tier 1 Training Slides — Implementation Package
What AI Actually Does in Plain Language
Explains hallucinations, the confidence trap, and how AI text generation actually works — in language every staff member, paralegal, and attorney can understand and immediately apply to their work.
Incident Response: Report It Immediately
Incident Response Decision Tree — Implementation Package
If Something Goes Wrong, Report It Immediately
Designed to be printed and posted. Covers what to do within the first 24 hours of an AI error — before speaking with the client again. 6-branch decision tree usable by any staff member without supervision.

Two paths to building a
documented AI governance framework.

Both are built specifically for Texas law firms. Both are ready to implement now. Choose based on where your firm is today.

📋
Choose Starter Kit if
You're a solo practitioner or small firm (2–5 attorneys) who wants a written AI policy, incident documentation, and updated engagement letter clauses you can deploy immediately. Begin building your compliance foundation today.
🏛️
Choose Implementation Package if Most Chosen
You want a full, auditable compliance program you could present to a malpractice carrier, bar investigator, or court — with training for every staff tier and a session-by-session implementation calendar. Built for firms of any size.
Package 01
Starter Kit

Start building a written AI policy, governance structure, and incident documentation in hours. Designed for solo practitioners and small firms of 2–5 attorneys who want a structured starting point for AI compliance. Attorney review required before adoption.

$499
one-time Digital delivery · 8 documents
  • AI Usage Policy Template — editable master governance policy; all attorneys and staff sign
  • AI Policy Scorecard — 25-item self-assessment identifying your specific compliance gaps
  • Staff Training Log — training records are evidence in bar proceedings
  • Incident Report Form — standardized documentation; complete within 24 hours of discovery
  • Court Disclosure Tracker — AI disclosure rules for Texas federal courts; verify before each filing
  • Engagement Letter AI Clauses — ready-to-insert client disclosure language by practice area
  • Quick Start Guide — 4-day implementation plan; exactly what to do, in order
  • README / Orientation Guide — start here; complete picture of what's in the kit
Get the Starter Kit — $499
Optional Add-On
Implementation Package + Live Training & Consulting

Add 4 hours of one-on-one online sessions to your Implementation Package. Work through the 30-session calendar with expert guidance — customizing policy language for your specific practice areas, answering firm-specific questions, and reviewing your implementation for completeness. Consulting sessions are practical guidance only — not legal advice.

4 scheduled 1-hour sessions
Full Implementation Package included
Practice-area-specific customization
Post-incident implementation support available
$2,499
Package + 4 hrs consulting
Schedule →

Everything included,
side by side.

Document / Component Starter Kit
$499
Implementation Package
$899
Core Governance Documents
AI Usage Policy Template
AI Policy Scorecard (25-item self-assessment)
Staff Training Log
Incident Report Form
Court Disclosure Tracker (Texas federal courts)
Engagement Letter AI Clauses (by practice area)
Quick Start Guide — 4-day implementation plan
Advanced Program (Implementation Package only)
AI Policy Assessment Workbook (gap analysis and audit-readiness tool)
Vendor Vetting Toolkit (10 pre-assessed common tools)
Training Slides — Tier 1 (All Staff)
Training Slides — Tier 2 (Attorneys)
Training Slides — Tier 3 (Partners/Supervisors)
Training Slides — Tier 4 (IT/Administration)
Presenter Notes included with all 4 training decks
Incident Response Decision Tree (6 branches)
30-Session Implementation Calendar
Total Documents817

What firms ask before
getting started

Yes. The obligations under TRAIGA and TDRPC apply regardless of firm size. Solo practitioners and 2-person firms using any AI tool in client matters have the same core obligations as large firms. The Starter Kit was specifically designed for the solo or small firm managing partner who has 4 focused hours — not someone with a compliance department.
No. The AI Usage Policy Template should be reviewed by a qualified Texas attorney before adoption, particularly if the managing partner is not a licensed Texas attorney. The toolkit provides governance documents and implementation structure — it does not substitute for attorney analysis of your firm's specific TRAIGA compliance obligations.
Start with the AI Policy Scorecard (included in both packages) — a 25-item self-assessment that identifies exactly where your current governance has gaps relative to Texas Ethics Opinion 705, TRAIGA, and ABA Opinion 512. Most firms discover that informal guidelines don't address vendor vetting, individual attorney liability documentation, or incident response timelines — gaps that carry real exposure.
The Starter Kit Quick Start Guide is designed for a solo or managing partner with 4 focused hours — resulting in a written AI policy, updated engagement letter language, and a designated AI Officer before your next client matter. The Implementation Package's 30-Session Calendar estimates 25–35 total hours for a solo practitioner across 3–6 calendar weeks, or 35–50 hours for a 2–5 attorney firm.
Yes. Both packages include practice-area-specific provisions for immigration, criminal defense, family law, personal injury/litigation, transactional/corporate, and estate planning/probate. The Implementation Package's Vendor Vetting Toolkit includes specific guidance for practices where data exposure carries heightened risk — immigration and criminal defense are flagged throughout for stricter evaluation. The CLOUD Act (18 U.S.C. § 2713) context is explicitly addressed.
The $899 Implementation Package gives you all 17 documents and the 30-session calendar — everything needed to implement on your own. The $2,499 option adds 4 one-on-one online sessions with a Mirasys consultant who walks through the calendar with you, customizes policy language for your specific practice areas, answers firm-specific questions in real time, and reviews your implementation for completeness. These are practical guidance sessions — not legal advice. Most firms that have had an AI incident or face active malpractice pressure choose this option.
Get started

Your firm's AI governance starts today.

TRAIGA is active. The Texas Bar has spoken. Courts are escalating. The question isn't whether your firm needs a governance framework — it's whether you build it before or after an incident.

All packages are digital delivery. These materials are starting-point templates — not legal advice, not a compliance guarantee. Attorney review required before adoption. No attorney-client relationship is created by purchase. By ordering you agree to the Terms & Conditions. Questions? [email protected]